[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spambayes-bugs
Subject:    [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1563506 ] Problem with "Big
From:       noreply () sourceforge ! net (SourceForge ! net)
Date:       2007-02-22 18:53:25
Message-ID: E1HKJ4H-0007Xa-JN () sc8-sf-monitor2 ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Bugs item #1563506, was opened at 2006-09-22 08:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rxpc
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1563506&group_id=61702

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: fuutott (fuutott)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem with "Big attachment" messages - proxy mode.

Initial Comment:
I've tried it with both 1.0.4 and 1.1a3. 

If the message with attachement exceeds ~2Mb spambayes 
messes something up and the outlook reports an error 

Task '217.10.144.98 - Receiving' reported error 
(0x800CCC0F) : 'The connection to the server was 
interrupted. If this problem continues, contact your 
server administrator or Internet service provider 
(ISP).'

Seems like spambayes is reporting message size bigger 
than it is.

There are no errors if I try to retrieve the message 
directly from the pop3 server. I'm using Mercury mail 
as the pop3.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: dale (rxpc)
Date: 2007-02-22 12:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1726143
Originator: NO

I am having similar problems on a Debian linux system running 1.0.4. 
Incoming seems to do better than outgoing.  The smtp proxy is already
choking at 1.5MB.  It does not matter if the email itself is large or if
the attachment is large.  Watching running processes shows tremendous cpu
usage (99%+) and 6% - 10% available memory usage.  Then, before finishing,
the cpu usage drops off suddenly, but the sb_server process continues and
is available for other mail.  I've also tried throwing more power at it by
installing on newer, more powerful systems.  It gets farther along in the
process, but ultimately fails.  I had one dual processor system (running
spambayes) that claimed the email+attachment was sent, but it never was
received by the recipient.
No errors were generated in syslog or anywhere else that I could think to
look.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1563506&group_id=61702

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]