[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: Which commercial engine to combine with SpamAssassin?
From:       Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar () fantomas ! sk>
Date:       2023-03-27 15:41:02
Message-ID: ZCG5DnoXggJETKE2 () fantomas ! sk
[Download RAW message or body]

>Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-03-27 16:56:
>>I have no problems with rejecting high scoring spams at SMTP level,
>>spamass-milter or amavisd-milter.

>i can do this in fuglu with is not a milter, thats not my point of 
>spamassassin is not designed to reject

SA is safe to reject at scores 8-10.

>>Helps much avoid troubles, especially with phishes.

On 27.03.23 17:35, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>yes we just need to design a phish first

I handle phishes like spams, with bit bigger priority:
I keep examples of each, train them, report to razor/pyzor/DCC.

However filtering phishes help muchmore against problems than filtering 
spams.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]