[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: BAYES scores
From:       Benny Pedersen <me () junc ! eu>
Date:       2023-03-01 13:49:26
Message-ID: d702829c4c51bfb09b57d9c6f1ca57fe () junc ! eu
[Download RAW message or body]

joe a skrev den 2023-02-28 17:37:
> Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
> I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
> 
> Noted in a header this morning:
> 
> *  3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> *      [score: 1.0000]
> *  0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
> *      [score: 1.0000]
> 
> Was this discussed recently?  I added a local score to mollify my
> sense of propriety.

what does it solve for you ?

maybe it could be changed to not overlap on scores, but what should 
scores change ?



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]