[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: Bitcoin rules
From:       RW <rwmaillists () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2018-10-22 12:38:37
Message-ID: 20181022133837.5d21fd0c () gumby ! homeunix ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:56:34 +0200
Daniele Duca wrote:

> On 22/10/2018 12:37, Paul Stead wrote:
> 
> >
> > This can be resolved by hashing the BTC address before lookup and
> > looking up the result hash in the DB
> >
> > Paul
> >  
> Yes, thanks for the suggestions, I would have done that in the next 
> version coming up in the following days, 

I wouldn't bother. The probability that two randomly chosen bitcoin
addresses have same lower case version is much less than the probability
that they same 128 bit hash value. 
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]