[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: spamassassin-users
Subject: Re: New type of monstrosity
From: Groach <groachmail-stopspammingme () yahoo ! com>
Date: 2017-02-09 15:35:22
Message-ID: 7dd1db93-98c5-48fe-4b6c-28895bfc901a () yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png
Come on chaps and chapesses. Nothing is going to be concluded between
you too. And having the last word doesnt make one better than the
others (and it still doesnt make you right).
Just agree that neither of you is going to convince the other or leave
them happy.
Life is short....and this is silly.
On 09/02/2017 15:26, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> Ruga <ruga@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> RFC-822 is the e-mail standard, without "group addresses". What we do
>> complies with the standard.
> You are wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
>
> Take a look at RFC-822: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt
>
> Go to Section 6. ADDRESS SPECIFICATION. Look at Section 6.1.
>
> Here's a copy/paste:
>
> address = mailbox ; one addressee
> / group ; named list
>
> group = phrase ":" [#mailbox] ";"
>
>
> Oh look! The group address specification! In RFC 822! Amazing!
>
> Ruga, my dear fellow, (or lady... I can't tell), stop digging yourself
> in deeper.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dianne.
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Arial"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png">https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png</a><br>
<br>
Come on chaps and chapesses. Nothing is going to be concluded
between you too. And having the last word doesnt make one better
than the others (and it still doesnt make you right).<br>
<br>
Just agree that neither of you is going to convince the other or
leave them happy.<br>
<br>
Life is short....and this is silly.<br>
<br>
</font><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/02/2017 15:26, Dianne Skoll
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20170209102617.4e61a0e7@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Ruga <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" \
href="mailto:ruga@protonmail.com"><ruga@protonmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">RFC-822 is the e-mail standard, without "group addresses". What \
we do complies with the standard.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
You are wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
Take a look at RFC-822: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt">https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt</a>
Go to Section 6. ADDRESS SPECIFICATION. Look at Section 6.1.
Here's a copy/paste:
address = mailbox ; one addressee
/ group ; named list
group = phrase ":" [#mailbox] ";"
Oh look! The group address specification! In RFC 822! Amazing!
Ruga, my dear fellow, (or lady... I can't tell), stop digging yourself
in deeper.
Regards,
Dianne.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic