[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham
From:       Matthias Apitz <guru () unixarea ! de>
Date:       2015-11-06 6:52:08
Message-ID: 20151106065208.GA1859 () c720-r276659
[Download RAW message or body]

El día Thursday, November 05, 2015 a las 04:24:04PM +0100, John Wilcock escribió:

> Le 05/11/2015 15:54, Matthias Apitz a écrit :
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on c720-r276659
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> > X-Spam-Level: **************************************************
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1000.0 required=3.0 tests=GTUBE,NO_RECEIVED,
> >          NO_RELAYS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
> > X-Spam-Report: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >          * 1000 GTUBE BODY: Generic Test for Unsolicited Bulk Email
> >          * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
> >          * -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received
> >          * headers
> > ...
> >
> > Why auto-learn wants the mail as HAM?
> 
> Because autolearning ignores rules with the noautolearn, userconf or 
> learn tflags set (and uses the scores from scoreset 0 or 1).
> 
> ...

Thanks for all explanations. I now have a better understanding of the
autolearning process. Please, can someone forward me off-list (gzip'ed with
complete header lines) a SPAM which resulted in autolearn=spam.

Thanks in advance.

	matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/  ☎ +49-176-38902045
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]