[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: I am getting lots of SPAM
From:       motty cruz <motty.cruz () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-05-30 18:17:12
Message-ID: CALoOYy4n=4n3f=rhkZP1aF92nAueDPC+YYzkJE_6mBLQ-PQK0Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thank you, I am running all.spamrats.com, also it may a huge different when
I took the recipient off whitelist.

Thanks for all your support.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
wrote:

>       reject_rbl_client all.spamrats.com <http://all.spamrats.com/>
>>>
>>
> On 29.05.14 13:17, Alex wrote:
>
>> What's that? That doesn't really have a reputation here, and it's not
>> going
>> to be more effective than zen or barracuda. Set up your RBLs so they're
>> weighted. Implement postscreen with postfix.
>>
>
> 5 years ago I have posted question about this blacklist:
> http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=123920398923786&w=2
>
>  X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3____
>>>          tests=[BAYES_99=4.5, BAYES_999=0.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,____
>>>          MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RDNS_NONE=2.013, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,____
>>>          URIBL_BLACK=1.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO=-6] autolearn=no
>>>
>>
>> Why is this user whitelisted if you consider it to be spam?
>>
>
> it's the recipient that is whitelisted. In such case it is really silly to
> blame SA for not marking _any_ mail as spam...
>
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Thank you, I am running <a \
href="http://all.spamrats.com">all.spamrats.com</a>, also it may a huge different \
when I took the recipient off whitelist.  <div><br></div><div>Thanks for all your \
support.  </div></div> <div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On \
Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk" target="_blank">uhlar@fantomas.sk</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

         reject_rbl_client <a href="http://all.spamrats.com" \
target="_blank">all.spamrats.com</a> &lt;<a href="http://all.spamrats.com/" \
target="_blank">http://all.spamrats.com/</a>&gt;<br> </blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
On 29.05.14 13:17, Alex wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> What&#39;s that? That doesn&#39;t really have a reputation \
here, and it&#39;s not going<br> to be more effective than zen or barracuda. Set up \
your RBLs so they&#39;re<br> weighted. Implement postscreen with postfix.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
5 years ago I have posted question about this blacklist:<br>
<a href="http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&amp;m=123920398923786&amp;w=2" \
target="_blank">http://marc.info/?l=<u></u>spamassassin-users&amp;m=<u></u>123920398923786&amp;w=2</a><br>
 <br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3____<br>
              tests=[BAYES_99=4.5, BAYES_999=0.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,____<br>
              MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RDNS_NONE=2.013, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,____<br>
              URIBL_BLACK=1.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO=-6] autolearn=no<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Why is this user whitelisted if you consider it to be spam?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
it&#39;s the recipient that is whitelisted. In such case it is really silly to<br>
blame SA for not marking _any_ mail as spam...<span class="HOEnZb"><font \
color="#888888"><br> <br>
<br>
-- <br>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, <a href="mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk" \
target="_blank">uhlar@fantomas.sk</a> ; <a href="http://www.fantomas.sk/" \
                target="_blank">http://www.fantomas.sk/</a><br>
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.<br>
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.<br>
Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic