[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: Enom strikes back?
From:       Axb <axb.lists () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-05-27 11:36:44
Message-ID: 538478CC.7060207 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 05/27/2014 01:30 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 12:24 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 26.05.2014 22:42, schrieb James B. Byrne:
>>> Regardless of Enom's purported size, what does this say about the registrar's
>>> ethics and the domains it hosts?  Should such companies and their clients be
>>> boycotted and thereby coerced into dealing with these frauds?
>>
>> what procedure a registrar should use ,to preview the intention of a
>> customer which registers domains....?
>>
> No 'domain name tasting', minimum registration period 1 year, requiring
> payment as part of the domain name registration process and activation
> only after the payment has been cleared by the registrar's bank would
> seem to be a good start.

.. and payment is made with a stolen credit card...

AND: domains are just just too cheap.

Anyway.. this is totally off topic in the SA list.
SDLU may be a better place for such discussions.

List Guidelines: http://www.new-spam-l.com/admin/faq.html
List Information: https://spammers.dontlike.us/mailman/listinfo/list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]