[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re:[SOLVED] Why rule "MISSING_SUBJECT" is fired?
From:       Marcin Mirosław <marcin () mejor ! pl>
Date:       2011-09-26 14:17:43
Message-ID: 4E808987.2040205 () mejor ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

W dniu 26.09.2011 15:53, Bowie Bailey pisze:
> There is nothing in that sample that would cause the rule to fire.  I
> downloaded it and ran it against my SA and did not get a match for
> MISSING_SUBJECT.  The only thing I can think of is that the headers end
> at the first blank line.  If there is a blank line somewhere in the
> headers, that will cause SA to treat everything below that line as part
> of the body rather than the header.

Email doesn't contain body so there is nothing after headers.

> Download your sample from pastebin and run it through SA to see if it
> still matches the rule for you.  You may have inadvertently fixed the
> problem when you munged the recipient address prior to uploading the sample.

I've downoloaded email from pastebin and nothing changed.

Reason: PEBKAC , i've got redundant backslash in own rules. I should use 
--lint more often.

Sorry for noise and thanks for your time!
Regards.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]