[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: DNSBL mirrors
From:       João_Gouveia <joao.gouveia () anubisnetworks ! com>
Date:       2010-02-28 2:50:20
Message-ID: 1189943837.1694.1267325420375.JavaMail.root () zimbra
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Bill,

----- "Bill Landry" <bill@inetmsg.com> wrote:

> On 2/27/2010 6:42 PM, João Gouveia wrote:

> >> I don't see where you have defined any of these entries that
> you're
> >> using in your meta rules:
> >>
> >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L5
> >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L4
> >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L3
> >> RCVD_IN_ANBREP_Z
> >>
> >> Did you intend for these to be MSPIKE rather than ANBREP?
> >>      
> > Yes. Different zone, different rule names. But the data is the
> same.
> > If you use the old zones/rules you'll get the same results, the
> difference being that we may eventually discontinue the old DNS zone
> (at least for public access).
> >    
> Well, currently there are name mismatches in your rules, they either
> all 
> need to be MSPIKE or ANBREP, but not a combination of both - otherwise
> 
> your meta rules don't make sense and will never trigger.

Thanks, didn't notice that some of the old rule names were that. Fixing that right away :-)

> Bill

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]