[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: Date parsing
From:       LuKreme <kremels () kreme ! com>
Date:       2009-08-27 15:04:20
Message-ID: E9474088-4C40-4CC0-855C-D34C025291F7 () kreme ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 27-Aug-2009, at 06:59, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> Date: 27 Aug 09 13:50:20 0100

> Although the date header was badly formatted, it wasn't actually  
> incorrect as far as when the message was sent. I don't think the  
> DATE_IN_PAST rules should fire if the date isn't valid in the first  
> place…

I dunno, the message is tagged as being 2,000 years old. That does  
qualify as more than 96 hours.


-- 
I draw the line at 7 unreturned phone calls.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]