[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: no bayes in spamc -R
From:       Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= <guenther () rudersport ! de>
Date:       2009-08-25 23:08:30
Message-ID: 1251241710.7233.107.camel () monkey
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:07 +0200, aep@exys.org wrote:
> when testing spam with spamc -R i dont see any bayes rating. I cant 
> remember seeing any _ever_.

Do you see BAYES_xx rules hitting, if you are *not* using the -R switch?

> Does that mean bayes has no rating, or is my spamc broken?

Sounds to me like you  (a) did not train sufficient spam and ham for
Bayes to kick in,  (b) disabled Bayes, or  (c) trained as another user
than is doing the checks.

spamc isn't really involved here, at least not concerning Bayes or not.
That is entirely up to spamd, your site-wide and user preferences and
the amount of mail trained -- for the user calling spamc to do the
check.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]