[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: Are my plugins working?
From:       mouss <mouss () netoyen ! net>
Date:       2008-09-30 0:29:30
Message-ID: 48E172EA.8060906 () netoyen ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hi all:
> 
> I'm learning a bit of SpamAssassin and its plugins. I'm not pretty sure 
> if some of them are really working (i.e. SPF plugin) so I run:
> 
> # spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 | less
> 
> ... looking for error/warning messages and I found some of them.
> 
> I would specially like to know if Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF is 
> really working since I got some lines like these:
> 
> [25752] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF, version v2.005
> [25752] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001
> [25752] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF from @INC
> [25752] dbg: spf: checking to see if the message has a Received-SPF 
> header that we can use
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> [25752] dbg: spf: cannot get Envelope-From, cannot use SPF
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> [25752] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding 
> with DNS based checks
> 
> I'm worried about the "cannot get Envelope-From, cannot use SPF" text 
> since I got the same when scannning text plain messages (spamassassin -D 
> < some-file.txt).
> 
> Is it necessarry that the Envelope-From header is included in a message 
> to perform a correct SPF verification? I thought that Return-Path header 
> it should be enough...

Return-Path is enough. so make sure the test message contains one. 
preferably, take a message that you received (on TB: view source then 
copy-paste).

> Am I missing something?
> 
> I hope someone can help me
> 
> P.D.: my english is not good :(

hopefully, your tailor is rich :)

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]