[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spamassassin-users
Subject:    Re: Spam not tagged
From:       mouss <mouss () netoyen ! net>
Date:       2008-05-27 1:41:23
Message-ID: 483B66C3.1070704 () netoyen ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

polloxx wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Last week we've got some spam, bounced messages (a so called joe-job)
> not tagged as spam in the subject. "Regular" spam messages are tagged
> in the subject. In the headers I see that spamassassin gave the
> message a score of above 24:
>
> May 23 19:36:29 server2 amavis[16930]: (16930-08) SPAM-TAG, <> ->
> <address@company.com>, Yes, score=24.347 tagged_abo
> ve=3 required=7 tests=[DCC_CHECK=1.37, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.808, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHO
> RT_LINK_IMG_3=0.556, PYZOR_CHECK=2.834, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5,
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E
> 8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, SARE_UNI=0.591, URIBL_AB_SURBL=1.613,
> URIBL_BLACK=1.961, URIBL_JP_SURBL=2.857, URIBL
> _OB_SURBL=2.132, URIBL_SC_SURBL=2.523, URIBL_WS_SURBL=2.1]
>
> But why did SA not add *** SPAM *** to the subject?
>   


This is an amavisd-new FAQ. amavisd-new only tags the subject for mail 
that is directed to local domains.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]