[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: spamassassin-users
Subject: Re: Registrar RBL: nomination and scoring
From: David Cary Hart <DavidHart () TQMcube ! com>
Date: 2006-08-13 17:55:03
Message-ID: 20060813135503.175ea8fe () dch ! TQMcube ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:26:28 -0700 (PDT), "John D. Hardin"
<jhardin@impsec.org> opined:
>
> Registrars' Terms of Service should be publicly available for
> review; standards for ToS treatment of spammer behavior should be
> fairly easy to develop and apply.
>
> Registrars' responsiveness to complaints should be fairly easy to
> track as well, and standards for that should also be possible.
>
> Meta-question: *how much* responsibility for the domain-owner's
> behavior does the registrar actually or reasonably bear? What form
> does that responsibility take?
And how much are you willing to pay for a domain?
>
I don't disagree with any of this. In fact, this could be a very
powerful economic boycott which is why I thought about it. I am only
pointing our the administrative difficulties.
How would you suggest the query mechanism works? I Most whois servers
impose some sort of volume limitation; Many are extremely slow.
Therefor, this probably warrants a RHSBL with the registrar in the
text record. In turn, that requires getting a listing of all domains
registered by a listed registrar.
How do you keep up with transfers?
If someone can figure out the mechanics, I have a volunteer (working
on her MBA) who is great at crafting policy. I also have the mirrors
and structure. I am willing to add the zone. My first listing would
be Gandi.
--
Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com
Don't Subsidize Criminals: http://boulderpledge.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic