[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       spacewalk-devel
Subject:    [Spacewalk-devel] version of API
From:       jmrodri () gmail ! com (Jesus M !  Rodriguez)
Date:       2008-09-30 20:53:25
Message-ID: c79f4f0c0809301353p30edc2c5w21cdcf5551cf04fe () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Miroslav Such? <msuchy at redhat.com> wrote:
> In Spacewalk 0.2 the api call api.getVersion return string 0.2.
> I think that is is bad and we should return to 5.something. Why?
> Because some satellite scripts may check, if we have sufficient api version.
> Now those scripts have to be rewritten.
> We can discuss what should be  something in 5.something, but we should
> definitely bump it up back.
>
> I suggest to bump it to 5.2.0 and then separate the numbering from numbering
> of satellite or spacewalk and with every change to api simple bump up the
> release part of api version number.
>
> Please raise your voice now.
> --
> Miroslav Suchy
> RHN Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-devel mailing list
> Spacewalk-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
>


The api returns the value from rhn.conf if the version in rhn.conf is
0.2, that's what it returns. That same value is used to display in the
webui.

So what problem are we fixing? did this break anyone? or just
potential for breakage.

jesus



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]