[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sox-users
Subject:    Re: [SoX-users] speech to .txt
From:       Jan Stary <hans () stare ! cz>
Date:       2014-12-28 12:33:12
Message-ID: 20141228123312.GA25999 () www ! stare ! cz
[Download RAW message or body]

On Dec 23 20:34:42, 4-werk@gmx.com wrote:
>    I was looking for a sox forum I tried audacity and was directed here.
> 
>    I do not know the etiquette of this site so I will just start begging
>    for help.
> 
> 
>    The project I am trying to build is a speech to text system.
> 
>    The system as 2 parts: first a sox filter to convert the mic input into
>    a binary file with a.. .txt label. The. .txt file is the in put to
>    another beautiful and free program called chatscript.

Does that mean you want the *.txt file to be a text transcript of the speech
that comes through the mic? SoX cannot do anything like that.

> Chatscript is
>    designed to let people make there own chat bots, I am intending to use
>    its most basic property. If the pattern in matches the pattern of the
>    rule then output the rules response. Or less abstractly, if the input
>    pattern matches the rule for P then it prints the letter P.
> 
> 
>    what I need sox to do is.
> 
>    A) use the key board space bar to mute and unmute the mic.

THis is none of SoX's job.

>    B) to take 32 bit samples of the sound.

rec -b 32

>    C) to contain no clobber at first so I can generate the files to go
>    into the rules to be matched against.

I don't really know what you mean; what "clobber"?

>    D) maximize The gain without clipping.

See the 'gain' effect.

>    E) no dither or other noise.

-D

>    F) multi thread, to process the tracks in parallel.

What "tracks", and why does that imply it needs to run multithread?

>    G) divide this into 2 tracks, if possible one the inverse of the other.

Divide what?


>    H) using the echo function (not echoes) add multiepal echoes to each
>    track, these echoes should be at the same volume as the track and have
>    no decay. It is these echoes superimposed on there original track that
>    carry the information about how the sound is changing with time.

The signal itself carries that information.
Why do you need the echo, exactly?

>    I) one track would have delays of 11, 17, 23, 31, 47 millisecond. And
>    he other would be 13, 19, 29, 37, 53,, millisecond.

Why?

>    J) these 2 tracks are then c

What?



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Sox-users mailing list
Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]