[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       snort-devel
Subject:    Native Oracle DATE support on timestamps (was: Re: [Snort-devel] database changes)
From:       "Roman Danyliw" <roman () danyliw ! com>
Date:       2002-02-28 20:29:37
[Download RAW message or body]

Recently commited changes to the database plugin:

+ DB schema version 105
+ native DATE support in Oracle for timestamps (Chad Kreimendahl)

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:21:21 -0600, Chris Green <cmg@uab.edu> wrote :

> "Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl@umb.com> writes:
> 
> > I'd consider the fact that all the other DBs that are output to use DATE
> > formats for the TIMESTAMP, and Oracle doesn't... to be a bug.  More than
> > anything, I'm trying to help snort to be used by more large corporations
> > (such as the ones we do work for).
> 
> Yes, that makes sense with regards to timestamp formats but
> >
> > Is there some procedure to follow in order to become a developer on this
> > project?
> 
> Not really, there are basically a couple pieces to snort
> 
> Snort Core:
> 
> Maintained by Marty and I've been working on cleaning it up here and
> there...
> 
> includes things like frag2 and stream4 and
> fast/full/binary/unified/syslog formats and the decoders
> 
> 
> The Horde of output plugins that new developments should be moved to
> barnyard on:
> 
> The output plugins that don't fall into the above category
> 
> Jed Pickel was the maintainer for snortdb stuff and then got busy and
> assigned it to Roman because he does the ACID development.
> 
> I know it's frustrating but I don't wanna get charged with
> maintainence of a SPO I don't use or recommend and I don't wanna
> change things underneath others.
> 
> Since it only affects oracle which is, AFAIK, a very small % of the
> userbase, I don't mind applying it and I'd like to make a decision on
> it ASAP so 1.8.4 that's shaping up will have it.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  CJK
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roman Danyliw [mailto:roman@danyliw.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:41 PM
> > To: snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: roman@danyliw.com
> > Subject: Re: [Snort-devel] database changes
> >
> >
> > I'm looking into it, but am I am trying to prioritize it with other things.
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:15:43 -0600, Chris Green <cmg@uab.edu> wrote :
> >
> >> "Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl@umb.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > has anyone given consideration to the patches I've submitted for
> >> > spo_database? 
> >> >
> >> 
> >> I was going to see if there was any feed back;  It's a contributed
> >> module and normally we don't touch them unless theres a critical bug
> >> but this seems reasonable, any objectors?
> 
> -- 
> Chris Green <cmg@uab.edu>
> Eschew obfuscation.
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Snort-devel mailing list
Snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]