[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       snap-users
Subject:    (KAME-snap 9348) Re: Question about the snap license
From:       SUZUKI Shinsuke <suz () kame ! net>
Date:       2006-02-09 3:58:25
Message-ID: x7k6c5ji8u.wl%suz () alaxala ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello,

>>>>> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:27:29 +0100
>>>>> jeremie.corbier@resel.enst-bretagne.fr(Jeremie Corbier)  said:

> I am packaging your dhcp6 for Debian and Ubuntu GNU/Linux as it is the
> most mature DHCPv6 solution available to my mind. I have designed the
> packaging as a source package named dhcpv6-kame which produces 3 binary
> packages : dhcpv6-kame-client, dhcpv6-kame-relay and
> dhcpv6-kame-server.
> 
> Now if I interpret correctly this part of the COPYRIGHT notice :
> 
> 3. Neither the name of the project nor the names of its contributors
>    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
>    without specific prior written permission.
> 
> I may not be allowed to use "kame" in the names of the different packages.
> 
> I had decided to call my packages dhcpv6-kame* because someone had
> already filed an "Intend To Package" for dhcpv6.sf.net with dhcpv6 as
> source package name.
> 
> Can I still keep "-kame" in the name of my packages or should I rename them?

Please use WIDE-DHCPv6 at sourceforge.net (http://wide-dhcpv6.sourceforge.net/).

This takes over the development/maintainance/releasing regarding
KAME's DHCPv6 (even after the conclusion of KAME).


Thanks,
----
SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]