[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: slony1-general
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Patches
From: Steve Singer <ssinger () ca ! afilias ! info>
Date: 2013-12-10 4:11:18
Message-ID: 52A69466.5090202 () ca ! afilias ! info
[Download RAW message or body]
On 12/09/2013 05:34 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Would anyone concerned like to try pull requests as a way to try
> things out from non-core developers like myself? I've been working on
> a few things in the altperl tools, and may wind into other parts of
> the system.
>
We've received and merged pull requests in the past. Sometimes we have
exchanged github pull requests as a way of exchanging patches on WIP
branches.
Slony doesn't have a github presence, but the core developers all have
the slony1-engine repository cloned under our accounts. A pull request
isn't going to be rejected on the basis of it being a pull request, but
there is a risk of it being forgotten about.
The time consuming part (for me) is actually testing the patches,
particularly with the altperl stuff.
> By the way, would there be a lot of objections to making a
> slon_tools.json as an alternative to slon_tools.conf, which is a chunk
> of Perl code?
>
My vote would be to only support one config file format so if we moved
to JSON we should drop support for the perl based .conf but provide a
converter. Dropping support for the old .conf format might raise more
objections.
> Cheers,
> David.
>
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general@lists.slony.info
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic