[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       slony1-general
Subject:    Re: [Slony1-general] Stop slon process?
From:       Jan Wieck <JanWieck () Yahoo ! com>
Date:       2005-11-29 18:01:46
Message-ID: 438C978A.5060805 () Yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/28/2005 2:00 PM, Vivek Khera wrote:

> On Nov 28, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> 
>> and then kill -9 the process(s).
> 
> kill -9 is a "rude" way to kill processes.  a normal TERM signal  
> should be sufficient and gives slon time to cleanup after itself.
> 
> kill -9 should be the method of last resort to kill any process.

I do agree that -9 is a bad habit. Although in the case of slon, not 
much harm will be done as all work is covered by transactions in the 
corresponding DB connections and killing slon the rude way will simply 
rollback.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]