[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly
From:       Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat () alum ! mit ! edu>
Date:       2014-05-12 15:40:47
Message-ID: 5370EB7F.2040900 () alum ! mit ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

On 5/12/14 10:16 AM, Brett Tate wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I assume that Paul intended to indicate RFC6337.

Thanks Brett. Yes, 6337.

	Thanks,
	Paul

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
>> implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Sander Rambags
>> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:54 AM
>> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive
>> answer after sendonly
>>
>>
>>
>> RFC6637 ??? I don't think that's the one you mean.
>>
>> Rg Sander
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]