[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    Re: [Sip-implementors] about proto sip test-tool
From:       Joshua Morin <josh () codenomicon ! com>
Date:       2009-06-23 16:25:13
Message-ID: 4A4101E9.6000102 () codenomicon ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello,
We do have a wide variety of IPv6 commercial suites. It would be best to 
take this off line from the the mailing list, I just don't want to seem 
like I am spamming the list with sales inquiries. :-)
If you would like more information on our test suites you can email me 
directly or info@codenomicon.com.


Cheers,

Joshua Morin
Security Engineer
Codenomicon Ltd.
Office: 781-777-2565
Mobile: 617-633-7221
PGP Key Id: 0xF9F4A63D 



Pavesi, Valdemar (NSN - US/Boca Raton) wrote:
> Do you have any equivalent for IPV6?
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> [mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of ext
> Joshua Morin
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:57 AM
> To: Jun Yin
> Cc: Ari Takanen; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] about proto sip test-tool
>
> Hello,
> The PROTOS Test-Suite: c07-sip is out of date and the research done with
>
> Protos has now evolved to a company called Codenomicon. We have a 
> commercial version of SIP client and server side tools supporting 
> multiple RPC's. You can still find the documentation and original 
> research here:
> http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/ouspg/protos/testing/c07/sip/
>
> Cheers,
>  
>
> Joshua Morin
> Security Engineer
> Codenomicon Ltd.
> Office: 781-777-2565
> Mobile: 617-633-7221
> PGP Key Id: 0xF9F4A63D 
>
>
>
> Jun Yin wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just start to use proto sip test-tool to test our sip alg.
>> I'm not sure if my understanding is right:
>> 1. all packets sent by the tool are invalid?
>> 2. SIP alg was supposed to block it?
>> 3. if one packet for one case passed, then it means test failed? and
>> then, how can I know why it fail?  i.e. testcase 194, I think it's
>> perfect.
>> 4. Can I find a document talking about each testcases about where is
>>     
> wrong?
>   
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>   

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]