[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    Re: [Sip-implementors] XCAP: Why "org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules" instead of just "pres-rules
From:       Iñaki_Baz_Castillo <ibc () aliax ! net>
Date:       2009-06-18 22:37:39
Message-ID: 200906190037.39904.ibc () aliax ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

El Jueves, 18 de Junio de 2009, martin.hynar@gmail.com escribió:
> Hi all
>
> Unfortunately, IETF's work on XCAP spec and related standards (pres rules,
> various extensions ...) was not fast enough and in some directions not
> broad enough. And OMA was pushed by industry to do something. If the
> standards defined by OMA had to be adopted by vendors they had to be frozen
> in some state and as vendors required to have several features
> standardized, OMA acted accordingly. That is why there are those oma
> specific AUID's and also namespaces. The OMA XDM 2.0 was planned to follow
> finalized IETF standards.

Thanks a lot for the explanation.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]