[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP IPv6 matching rules
From:       "Brett Tate" <brett () broadsoft ! com>
Date:       2007-10-31 18:57:48
Message-ID: BBE61D1553D8A34F812FF87377B2935F01B78829 () ATL1VEXC020 ! usdom003 ! tco ! tc
[Download RAW message or body]

> Brett Tate wrote:
> > Vijay: Would it be beneficial to provide a related 
> > test within draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests and 
> > point to the RFC discussing the rules?
> 
> Brett: I do not mind providing a test case or so to cover 
> this aspect.  Is there an RFC that talks about matching of 
> the sort you have pointed out?  If so, we devise a test or 
> two for inclusion.

I have not found an RFC which clearly discusses it.  Thus the reason it
might be beneficial to discuss within
draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests and/or
draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition.

RFC4291 discusses some aspects.  However I haven't found anything
specifically discussing IPv6-address equality and related impacts upon a
URI.  My first set of matching questions mainly focused upon rfc4291
section 2.2.  My second set of matching questions mainly focused upon
rfc4291 section 2.5.5.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]