[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    RE: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer (unattended / attended)
From:       "Parveen Jain" <parveen.jain () conexant ! com>
Date:       2005-06-29 4:42:40
Message-ID: 4D6E93075B31154298572E6B73CA849D015211A1 () noida-mail ! bbnet ! ad
[Download RAW message or body]

It will not .Both can work in dependably. 



-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-bounces@cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Vic
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:29 AM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Call transfer (unattended / attended)

Hi, I got a little question now...

    I had implemented unattended(or blind) transfer,  and I need to
implement attended transfer now.

My question is -  Would it conflict if we implement both kinds of
transfer ?
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors




********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the \
intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is \
strictly prohibited.  If you have received the message in error, please advise the \
                sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]