[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    RE: [Sip-implementors] for call hold does 200 OK for Re-Invite ne eds to have a=recvonly
From:       Gupta Adetya-A19368 <adetya.gupta () motorola ! com>
Date:       2003-02-17 12:29:27
Message-ID: 653138C25D8AD6118292000347080A3702CE6BAC () zin05exm02 ! corp ! mot ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

But is it necessary for A to send message with SDP attribute = sendrecv,
i mean isnt that supposed to be by default, if i dont send the attribute field
when making B off hold

-----Original Message-----
From: Ranjit Kumar Avasarala [mailto:ranjit.avasarala@bplmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:07 PM
To: Gupta Adetya-A19368; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] for call hold does 200 OK for Re-Invite
needs to have a=recvonly


yes A should reply with the SDp attribute a=recvonly
A replies with SDP attribute a=sendrecv when B removes it off hold (i,e it
sends INVITE with SDP attribute a=sendrecv)


Ranjit

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-admin@cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-admin@cs.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Gupta
Adetya-A19368
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 4:23 PM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] for call hold does 200 OK for Re-Invite
needs to have a=recvonly


Hi All,
              I have a small doubt ...


As per draft-ietf-sipping-services-examples-03

User A & User B are in active call. User B wants to place User A on hold.
So User B sends a Re-Invite with attribute parameter in the SDP body as
sendonly.
As per the above mentioned draft, User A replies with a normal 200 OK.

Should not User A reply with a 200 OK, with attribute field in the SDP body
as recvonly ?



Adetya
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]