[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sip-implementors
Subject:    [Sip-implementors] Please ignore this mail.
From:       "Rajneesh" <rajneesh_m () bhartitelesoft ! com>
Date:       2002-02-21 11:31:26
Message-ID: 000f01c1bac9$a35cdf10$050210ac () bhartitelesoft ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi All,

Please ignore this mail, this is sent by mistake.

Regards,
Rajneesh
----- Original Message -----
From: Rajneesh <rajneesh_m@bhartitelesoft.com>
To: <sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Sip-implementors digest, Vol 1 #428 - 2 msgs


> aby kya hua jawab nahi diya???
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <sip-implementors-request@cs.columbia.edu>
> To: <sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 10:31 PM
> Subject: Sip-implementors digest, Vol 1 #428 - 2 msgs
>
>
> > Send Sip-implementors mailing list submissions to
> > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > sip-implementors-request@cs.columbia.edu
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > sip-implementors-admin@cs.columbia.edu
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Sip-implementors digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Removing Bindings (Theodoros Kyrimalis)
> >    2. 183 response (Lorenzo_Boffelli@alliedtelesyn.com)
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > From: "Theodoros Kyrimalis" <tkyr@intranet.gr>
> > To: <sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu>
> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:06:23 +0100
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Removing Bindings
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > In section 10.2.2 Removing Bindings, it is stated that registrations
> expire
> > unless refreshed, but can also be explicitly removed. This can be done
> only
> > by the client side though. Is there any way to remove registrations by
the
> > server side explicitly?
> > To my understanding there is no such way according to the draft. Is
there
> > any future plan to add this feature, or any known extension that I have
> > missed?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Theodoros
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 2
> > From: Lorenzo_Boffelli@alliedtelesyn.com
> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:57:54 -0800
> > To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] 183 response
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > Suppose to use a SIP Proxy Server that make a call forking.
> >
> > UserA call UserB and Proxy forks the call to UserB1, UserB2 and UserB3
> > Suppose UserB1, UserB2 and UserB3 respond with a 183 code with SDP.
> > UserA receive tree 183 message with 3 different SDP and it has to open
the
> RTP
> > channel. Which SDP it must use?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Lorenzo
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________
> >
> > Lorenzo Boffelli
> > STRE Engineer
> >
> > Allied Telesis K.K.
> > Head Office / 4F TOC Bldg, 7-22-17 Nishi-Gotanda,
> > Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo Japan, 141-8635
> > European R&D Center
> > Piazza Tirana, 24/4 b   Phone: +39 02 41411201
> > 20147 Milano        Fax:     +39 02 41411260
> > ITALY
> > Email: lorenzo_boffelli@alliedtelesyn.com
> > ___________________________________________
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
> > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
> >
> > End of Sip-implementors Digest
> >
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]