[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       shibboleth-dev
Subject:    RE: R4481 Checkstyle Parameter Rename Issue
From:       "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 () osu ! edu>
Date:       2016-09-15 14:14:51
Message-ID: 9846A6064BD102419D06814DD0D78DE112A1948F () CIO-TNC-D2MBX02 ! osuad ! osu ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

> For the rest, I'm with Scott that this is a much better way to proceed - putting
> the work on our shoulders not the deployers.  Also I now understand why
> the java classes needed to be summoned up with parameter numbers for
> constructors.

Me too, java.lang.String specifically.

> I'm assuming that we will not move off debug builds in V3 (save perhaps for a
> test).  But is there any reason not to do it for V4?  Shall I pop in a V4 case?

Seems likely, but I would defer to the Java experts.

-- Scott

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]