[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       shibboleth-dev
Subject:    Re: [Shib-Dev] attribute-encoder.xml?
From:       Chad La Joie <lajoie () itumi ! biz>
Date:       2010-02-04 21:42:49
Message-ID: 4B6B3F59.10003 () itumi ! biz
[Download RAW message or body]

Yeah, *if* we do this, that's how it would work.

On 2/4/10 4:31 PM, Christopher Bongaarts wrote:
> Nate Klingenstein wrote:
>> Shibbolizers,
>>
>> An idea struck me while trolling through another
>> attribute-resolver.xml file and talking to Chad. Would it be better if
>> attribute encoders were maintained in a separate file, like attribute
>> filters?
>
> I prefer to have them in the same file, but I'm OK with splitting the
> encoder definitions out from inside the attribute definitions. If it
> were done the way you propose (and the attribute-encoder.xml is read by
> adding a ConfigurationResource to the existing AttributeResolver Service
> in services.xml), then Etan and I could have our cake and eat it too by
> removing that ConfigurationResource and just including the elements in
> the resolver file.
>
>> I'd also like the attribute-encoder.xml defaults to be uncommented in
>> the distribution. Since the corresponding attributes are already
>> commented out, I can't see any harm from doing so, but it would make
>> the IdP more approachable to deployers.
>
> No problem with this.
>

-- 
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]