[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       semsdev
Subject:    [Semsdev] Re: [Serdev] Re: TECHNICAL BOARD - Nomination and voting
From:       "Greger Viken Teigre" <greger () teigre ! com>
Date:       2007-05-18 9:23:35
Message-ID: 200705180909.l4I98x9i011046 () pontius ! teigre ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the mailing lists. I think 
secret voting should have a very clear rationale in order to prefer it.
g-) 

------- Original message -------
From: Martin Hoffmann <hn@nvnc.de>
Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org, serdev@lists.iptel.org, semsdev@iptel.org
Sent: 18.5.'07,  10:54

> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> > I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote.  My 
> > interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and vote 
> > using another procedure than default in consensus building: posting to 
> > the list.
> 
> I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be secret.
> 
> Regards,
> Martin

_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
Semsdev@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]