[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       selinux
Subject:    Re: [SEMANAGE] nodecon
From:       Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh () redhat ! com>
Date:       2006-01-30 19:14:49
Message-ID: 43DE65A9.6000504 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:01 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
>   
>> Chad Hanson wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are there any plans for adding nodecon support to libsemanage? We would like
>>> to request this functionality as we use the nodecon rules in our solutions.
>>> We noticed this deficiency in examining our existing toolset and mapping the
>>> functionality to libsemanage. It is crucial to manage the domains/labels of
>>> hosts/networks.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I can work on adding nodecon support to libsepol and libsemanage, if 
>> that's agreed on (Stephen?)
>>     
>
> Yes, I agree that it would be useful.
>
>   
I think it is fine to do this, but I still believe this is more in the 
realm of iptables then really the role of SELinux.

Dan

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]