[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: security-basics
Subject: Re: Linux Port Scanning Tools
From: Alan Boyd <a.boyd () ed ! ac ! uk>
Date: 2001-05-31 8:36:26
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tue, 29 May 2001, charles mcdermott wrote:
> With all due respect given to NMAP, I think it sucks. I use superscan
from
> www.foundstone.com it seems to be a much better scanner. The biggest
problem
> I've had with NMAP it that it skips ports. Specifically the high ports
> around 60000 and up. Has anyone else had this problem? I have run it on
> Redhat 6.2 and 7.0 and it only finds those ports 1 out of 4 times and I'm
> sorry but thats not consistant enough for me.
NMap by default will only scan the ports listed in the nmap-services
file (/usr/share/nmap/.); any other ports you wish to include in your
scan must be specified.
I've personally found nmap invaluable in my work.
--
Alan Boyd
Network Services Division
University of Edinburgh
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic