'[jira] Closed: (JUDDI-374) openjpa + postgresql has problems with'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       scout-dev
Subject:    [jira] Closed: (JUDDI-374) openjpa + postgresql has problems with
From:       "Kurt T Stam (JIRA)" <juddi-dev () ws ! apache ! org>
Date:       2010-11-09 22:18:22
Message-ID: 11500424.109771289341102502.JavaMail.jira () thor
[Download RAW message or body]


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel \
]

Kurt T Stam closed JUDDI-374.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Worked around the postgres bug by not pushing timestamps past the year 2030.

> openjpa + postgresql has problems with timestamps
> -------------------------------------------------
> 
> Key: JUDDI-374
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374
> Project: jUDDI
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2
> Reporter: Tom Cunningham
> Assignee: Kurt T Stam
> Fix For: 3.0.5
> 
> Attachments: persistence.xml
> 
> 
> Seeing a problem with timestamps on postgres / openjpa.      Two tests fail.     \
>                 Attaching persistence.xml to bug.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_010_PublisherIntegrationTest
> 16:05:46,827 INFO  [ClientConfig] Reading UDDI Client properties file \
> file:/home/tcunning/src/juddi/trunk/uddi-tck/target/classes/META-INF/uddi.xml \
> 16:05:46,872 INFO  [ClientConfig] XRegistration 0 servicebindingKeys 16:05:46,873 \
> INFO  [ClientConfig] XRegistration 0 businessKeys 16:05:46,874 INFO  \
> [UDDIClerkManager] Starting UDDI Clerks for manager test-manager... 16:05:46,874 \
> INFO  [UDDIClerkManager] Clerks started succesfully for manager test-manager \
> authtoken:b68ce324-d442-47a8-b4b0-b35fd5ff608b Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: \
> 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.659 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_020_TmodelIntegrationTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, \
> Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.361 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_060_PublisherAssertionIntegrationTest Tests run: 1, \
> Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.132 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_040_BusinessServiceIntegrationTest Tests run: 2, \
> Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.948 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_030_BusinessEntityIntegrationTest Tests run: 2, \
> Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.151 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.JUDDI_010_PublisherIntegrationTest \
> authtoken:da270762-869e-48a4-ba3f-2c5e0fae57e9 Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: \
> 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.104 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_070_FindEntityIntegrationTest Tests run: 1, Failures: \
> 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.669 sec Running \
> org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest 16:06:12,216 ERROR \
>                 [TckSubscription] Bad value for type timestamp : invalid
> javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Bad value for type timestamp : invalid
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.fault.SOAP11Fault.getProtocolException(SOAP11Fault.java:188)
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.fault.SOAPFaultBuilder.createException(SOAPFaultBuilder.java:122)
>   at com.sun.xml.ws.client.sei.SyncMethodHandler.invoke(SyncMethodHandler.java:119)
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.client.sei.SyncMethodHandler.invoke(SyncMethodHandler.java:89)
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.client.sei.SEIStub.invoke(SEIStub.java:118)
> 	at $Proxy49.getSubscriptionResults(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.TckSubscription.getSamSyndicatorSubscriptionResultsWithChunkingOnFind(TckSubscription.java:202)
>   at org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest.samSyndicatorWithChunkingOnFind(UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest.java:139)
>   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>   at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>   at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:334)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:980)
> 16:06:13,994 ERROR [TckSubscription] Bad value for type timestamp : invalid
> javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Bad value for type timestamp : invalid
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.fault.SOAP11Fault.getProtocolException(SOAP11Fault.java:188)
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.fault.SOAPFaultBuilder.createException(SOAPFaultBuilder.java:122)
>   at com.sun.xml.ws.client.sei.SyncMethodHandler.invoke(SyncMethodHandler.java:119)
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.client.sei.SyncMethodHandler.invoke(SyncMethodHandler.java:89)
> 	at com.sun.xml.ws.client.sei.SEIStub.invoke(SEIStub.java:118)
> 	at $Proxy49.getSubscriptionResults(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.TckSubscription.getSamSyndicatorSubscriptionResultsWithChunkingOnGet(TckSubscription.java:251)
>   at org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest.samSyndicatorWithChunkingOnGet(UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest.java:157)
>   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>   at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>   at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:334)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:980)
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 8.581 sec <<< \
> FAILURE! Running org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_050_BindingTemplateIntegrationTest
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.692 sec
> Running org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_090_SubscriptionListenerIntegrationTest
> Going to read from file: \
>                 /home/tcunning/src/juddi/trunk/uddi-tck/temp/uddiclient.log
> ....Found String@SLTests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: \
> 5.629 sec Results :
> Failed tests: 
> samSyndicatorWithChunkingOnFind(org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest)
>  samSyndicatorWithChunkingOnGet(org.apache.juddi.v3.tck.UDDI_080_SubscriptionIntegrationTest)
>  Tests run: 19, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic