[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       scilab-users
Subject:    Re: [Scilab-users] Parallel execution on Mac
From:       Arvid_Rosén <arvid () softube ! com>
Date:       2015-02-15 15:07:54
Message-ID: 3B2A3EB6-101A-4431-902F-C8C8F475C3F2 () softube ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Yeah, I know about that bug. Does anyone know if it is difficult to fix?

I have used a custom solution for parallel processing previously (using fork), but it \
crashes now in libBLAS.

/Arvid

> 15 feb 2015 kl. 15:46 skrev Stéphane Mottelet <stephane.mottelet@utc.fr>:
> 
> Le 15/02/2015 12:01, Arvid Rosén a écrit :
> > Anyone out there who is using any successful ways of running heavy scilab jobs in \
> > parallel across several cores on Mac OS? 
> > 8 cores, with 1 in use is, is a bit annoying when you are sitting there waiting \
> > for the processing to finish. 
> > Cheers,
> > Arvid
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.scilab.org
> > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Hello,
> 
> The problem is that parallel_run is still broken under MacOSX (see \
> http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13158). For some applications, such as \
> Monte-Carlo estimations, this is not a big problem, since you just have to submit \
> more tasks that expected. But for other tasks, such as partionning a big domain for \
> independant computations (e.g. computing the Mandelbrot Set), this prohibits its \
> usage. Under Linux, I have no problem using simultaneously 40 cores. 
> S.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]