[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sbcl-help
Subject:    Re: [Sbcl-help] Setting startup *package* of saved core?
From:       Stas Boukarev <stassats () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-01-30 21:00:29
Message-ID: CAF63=12pQo3Efec6FpwG5-jJrTpPjqCmLA_q3Mh9Z5S=MUhiNA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Don't use sb-impl::toplevel-init then, it's responsible for argument processing.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Nicolas Neuss <neuss@math.fau.de> wrote:
> Stas Boukarev <stassats@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I'm not sure what you're doing, but that works as expected, *package*
>> is #<PACKAGE "TEST">
>
> Thank you!  This information helped me to find the problem.
>
>> Are you sure you're starting up the right executable?
>
> The executable was OK.  But I discovered that I had in my .sbclrc at the
> beginning
>
>   (in-package :cl-user)
>
> When I dropped this statement, everything went fine.
>
> Hmm.  So maybe such a saved application (Femlisp in my case) should not
> consider .sbclrc anymore?  Or should .sbclrc always be written
> independent on the setting of *package* (maybe by saving and restoring
> it)?
>
> Thanks again (also to all others who answered),
>
> Nicolas



-- 
With best regards, Stas.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Sbcl-help mailing list
Sbcl-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-help
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]