[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sbcl-devel
Subject:    Re: [Sbcl-devel] Memory corruption on foreign thread callbacks win33
From:       Douglas Katzman via Sbcl-devel <sbcl-devel () lists ! sourceforge ! net>
Date:       2022-06-10 22:08:10
Message-ID: CAOrNasxdQsHP0416Xm17mAAWrbkoDh6P-H32AdcuMNtzGxiXQw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


preserve_pointer does the right thing no matter what, so if it requires 4
extra comparisons to find out that it's OK not to call it, I would say
don't bother with the extra comparisons.
I assume that win32 is working fine without this at the current head,
right? If so, there's really nothing further to do, other than write a
regression test. i.e. the patch should not be applied in my opinion.

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">preserve_pointer does the right thing no matter what, \
so if it requires  4 extra comparisons to find out that it&#39;s OK not to call it, I \
would say don&#39;t bother with the extra comparisons.<div>I assume that win32 is \
working fine without this at the current  head, right? If so, there&#39;s really \
nothing  further to do, other than write a regression test. i.e. the patch should not \
be applied in my opinion.</div></div></div>





_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
Sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]