[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sbcl-devel
Subject:    Re: [Sbcl-devel] [Sbcl-commits] master: Remove SB-COLD:PRESERVING-HOST-FUNCTION, RESTORE-HOST-FUNCTI
From:       Eric Timmons <etimmons () mit ! edu>
Date:       2022-04-18 21:42:59
Message-ID: 605c9ee9-c8ca-afc3-ae27-67ada87dd5e0 () mit ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

On 4/18/22 17:22, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> Eric Timmons <etimmons@mit.edu> writes:
> 
>> On 4/18/22 17:01, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
>>> Douglas Katzman via Sbcl-devel <sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> writes:
>>>
>>>> Yup, leaving this change in would have significantly raised the barrier to
>>>> entry for people who pulled last month's release and tried to build from a
>>>> prebuilt.
>>> Well, true, but... have we had any reports of that happening in the
>>> wild?  (I haven't seen any that I can recall).
>>
>> I know this broke FreeBSD's pkg build. The maintainer said they
>> emailed sbcl-bugs on Apr 5, but I don't see it on the web interface.
> 
> Huh.  I didn't see that, no.  Is that because the pkg build takes the
> version from sbcl.org as its build host?

Yep! Same with Gentoo.

>> I haven't tested, but I'm pretty sure it also breaks Gentoo's build
>> for (not (or x86-64 ppc64le)) systems.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christophe


_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
Sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]