[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       samba-technical
Subject:    SUCCESS: Samba 2.2.3 and offline folders with W2K SP2
From:       Beschorner Daniel <Daniel.Beschorner () unit-netz ! de>
Date:       2002-02-28 12:30:10
[Download RAW message or body]

Yes, it did it.
It also cures affected files by next synchronization.

Thanks,
Daniel.



>On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:46:10PM +0100, Beschorner Daniel wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Here is a scenario where Samba 2.2.3a fails, but 2.2.2 succeeds:
>> 
>> 1. make a samba folder in W2K SP2 offline available
>> 2. disconnect from network, go offline
>> 3. create a sample file on client, i.e. a simple text file
>> 4. you can access it
>> 5. go online and synchronize files
>> 6. still can access it
>> 7. go offline again
>> 8. "access denied" message appears when try to open the file offline
>> 
>> "nt acl support" doesn't matter, only two ways out: downgrade server to
>> 2.2.2 or uninstall SP2 on client
>
>Thanks for the excellent bug report.
>
>I've nailed this I think - here's the patch for 2.2.3a.
>
>Please test and report back.
>
>Jeremy.
>
>--- smbd/nttrans.c.orig Wed Feb 27 12:34:12 2002
>+++ smbd/nttrans.c      Wed Feb 27 12:34:58 2002
>@@ -909,8 +909,8 @@
>        if(oplock_request && EXCLUSIVE_OPLOCK_TYPE(fsp->oplock_type))
>               smb_action |= EXTENDED_OPLOCK_GRANTED;
>
>-#if 1 /* JRATEST */
>-       /* W2K sends back 42 words here ! */
>+#if 0
>+       /* W2K sends back 42 words here ! If we do the same it breaks
offline sync. Go figure... ? JRA. */
>        set_message(outbuf,42,0,True);
> #else
>        set_message(outbuf,34,0,True);

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]