[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       samba-docs
Subject:    Re: generating docs from DocBook sources (fwd)
From:       Rafal Szczesniak <mimir () spin ! ict ! pwr ! wroc ! pl>
Date:       2001-09-26 10:45:12
[Download RAW message or body]



I've forgot to send it to samba-docs too.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:43:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Rafal Szczesniak <mimir@spin.ict.pwr.wroc.pl>
To: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: generating docs from DocBook sources

On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:

> What do you think about this? It's about docs/docbook/manpages
> actually, but anything else from docbook sources will be concerned
> (sooner or later).
>
> (1) Is it better to check with the ./configure script what files do we
> actually have in docbook/manpages (note, that these may change as more
> i18n languages may be supported as time goes) and on that basis
> generate proper Makefile by substituting variable in Makefile.in
>
>  or
>
> (2) to leave it as is, hardcoding further i18n files in Makefile.in
> (just like it's done now). This may unneccessarily enlarge Makefile.in
> as, after some period of time, it may contain paths to the same file
> actually, but in 5 (just for instance) languages ! It sounds like a
> kind of redundancy even if these paths would differ with lang
> subdirectory name.
>
> Plese, tell me what do you think, because this affects my decision on
> which patch to send.

OK. I see no response, so, in the meanwhile, I'll provide a patch for
the former case.



Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <mimir@spin.ict.pwr.wroc.pl>   |
*BSD, Linux and Samba                                  /
______________________________________________________/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]