[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ruby-talk
Subject: Re: RDoc-style documentation for Ruby keywords
From: Eric Hodel <drbrain () segment7 ! net>
Date: 2009-06-30 2:04:03
Message-ID: 2F534646-787E-4672-8E52-0D1A39927749 () segment7 ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On Jun 29, 2009, at 17:45, "David A. Black" <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
> Cool. Do you think there's a fundamentally better way to do the whole
> thing than these phony method definitions? (def false, etc.) I like
> having them split up, method-fashion, but it's a kluge.
In RDoc 2 you can use directives to make methods:
##
# :method: false
# blah blah comment
##
# :method: or
# etc.
But it still would need to live somewhere like Object (at least IIRC)
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic