[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ruby-talk
Subject:    Re: Why does Array#first not use rb_ary_subseq?
From:       Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz () ruby-lang ! org>
Date:       2007-05-18 14:10:22
Message-ID: 1179497429.970536.399.nullmailer () x31 ! netlab ! jp
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

In message "Re: Why does Array#first not use rb_ary_subseq?"
    on Fri, 18 May 2007 22:35:08 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

|Just because it is just an implementation matter.  Anyway, I will
|examine your code example, and check what we can do.

I am sorry, I was bit confused with 1.9 (trunk) and 1.8 which you are
talking about.  You are right.  Array#first should utilize
copy-on-write as much as it can.  I will fix.

							matz.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]