[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ruby-talk
Subject:    Re: [ANN] Dissident 0.1, a Ruby dependency injection container
From:       Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM () tiscali ! it>
Date:       2005-09-22 15:21:39
Message-ID: 4332cbb5$0$8476$5fc30a8 () news ! tiscali ! it
[Download RAW message or body]

Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@tiscali.it> writes:
> 
> 
>>Piergiuliano Bossi wrote:
>>
>>>Logan Capaldo wrote:
>>>
>>>The whole point is about lower coupling, higher cohesion, enhance
>>>independence, ease testing in isolation.
>>
>>Ehm, to be precise I'm not advocating the use of an IoC container; on
>>the other side, the principle of dependency injection is an important
>>tool to put in your box.
> 
> 
> Just curious, but you could explain why you do not advocate using IoC
> containers?

Jacob explained it perfectly. FWIW, I like Jim Weirich position too.
The exact need for an IoC container/framework would be less 
important/frequent if you use a flexible language like ruby and/or you 
develop with dependency injection in mind.

Ciao
Giuliano

-- 
If you want to send me an email address should be 'p', then a dot, 
followed by 'bossi' at 'quinary', another dot and 'com' at last

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]