[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ruby-talk
Subject:    Re: [ANN] Dissident 0.1, a Ruby dependency injection container
From:       Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-09-22 14:24:48
Message-ID: m2vf0tji2v.fsf () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@tiscali.it> writes:

> Piergiuliano Bossi wrote:
>> Logan Capaldo wrote:
>> 
>> The whole point is about lower coupling, higher cohesion, enhance
>> independence, ease testing in isolation.
>
> Ehm, to be precise I'm not advocating the use of an IoC container; on
> the other side, the principle of dependency injection is an important
> tool to put in your box.

Just curious, but you could explain why you do not advocate using IoC
containers?

> Giuliano
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]