[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ruby-talk
Subject: Re: Is this old style Ruby?
From: why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk () whytheluckystiff ! net>
Date: 2005-02-16 6:11:40
Message-ID: 4212E3F4.5070807 () whytheluckystiff ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> I allow '::' for method calls to denote class methods (with C++ style
> appearance). David doesn't like it. I think _why liked it.
I like it okay. Not with fervor.
@var is instance var. obj.meth is instance method.
@@var is class var. obj::meth is class method.
I guess I thought that the notion of single-character for any instance
syntax and double-character for any class syntax might be simpler.
It's arbitrary, though. If it's confusing to most, I definitely want to
change it's use in the (Poignant) Guide.
_why
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic