[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ruby-talk
Subject:    Re: Interfaces in Ruby
From:       Austin Ziegler <austin () halostatue ! ca>
Date:       2002-10-17 16:00:21
[Download RAW message or body]

>The argument I see over and over is that unit testing is an
>acceptable and preferable alternative to contracts.  I'm not=
 sure
>whether I agree.

Wouldn't DbC take care of this?

http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ruby/downloads/dbc.html

I mean, I'm not going to pretend that I understand DbC, yet,=
 despite 
having read PP, but if an interface is supposed to represent a 
contract, why not use real contracts in the code?

-austin
-- Austin Ziegler, austin@halostatue.ca on 2002.10.17 at=
 11.57.01




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]