[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       rtir
Subject:    Re: [Rtir] Queues - There is no mapping for statuses between these queues.
From:       Kevin Falcone <falcone () bestpractical ! com>
Date:       2013-09-11 14:45:33
Message-ID: 20130911144533.GD84983 () jibsheet ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:37:52PM +0200, Christophe Vandeplas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Kevin Falcone <falcone@bestpractical.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:24:45AM +0200, Christophe Vandeplas wrote:
> >> Thank you Kevin and Landon for the reply !
> >>
> >> After fiddling a little bit more ... woohoo, now I get it...
> >
> >> I tried to follow this guide:
> >> http://bestpractical.com/docs/rtir/3.0/Constituencies.html#Managing-Constituency-Values
> >> However some things were not really clear to me.
> >>
> >> Kevin,
> >> Would you be able to update the Constituencies.html documentation a
> >> little bit to make it clear that the newly created Queues are there
> >> only for technical reasons, and are NOT meant to be used directly
> >> reasons?
> >
> > Are you up to sending a patch to the docs making it clearer?
> > There are directions on getting a copy of the rtir source here
> > http://bestpractical.com/rtir/git.html
> > and these days github will even let you generate pull requests almost
> > directly from the UI.
> 
> done:
> https://github.com/bestpractical/rtir/pull/1

Thanks - I will have a look later this week or next and get it merged
down.  I see a minor pod error we'll have to correct (F<> is for
files, not for emphasis) but otherwise it looks good.

-kevin

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Rtir mailing list
Rtir@lists.bestpractical.com
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rtir


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]