[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       rrd-users
Subject:    Re: [rrd-users] Disabling Last Update
From:       Simon Hobson <linux () thehobsons ! co ! uk>
Date:       2012-11-08 18:44:24
Message-ID: p06240828ccc1ad3c5126 () simon ! thehobsons ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

Wesley Wyche wrote:
>I'll try a mock up where I submit using MY time values in sequence and see if
>it accepts it.  As long as it will accept values in the PAST (but just later
>than the last PAST value) then we are good to go.  I can make it work using
>that concept.

It will, you can use any timestamps you want - you just can't go 
backwards in time.

>I was just seeing (before as i recall), that it would NOT accept values
>older than the last current timestamp.  So, if I started with a 1352393972
>as the first value submitted but NOW was 1352394572 (for example, 10 minutes
>difference...the lag), then an update using the time value of 1352393992 (20
>seconds later in the sample time), it would complain and reject it stating
>that the value was prior to the last update value.
>
>Maybe I was mistaken and i fed in a time value that was indeed older (less
>than 1352393972).

That's more likely - testing these things can be "a bit tricky" at times !
I vaguely recall some serious head scratching at times, just 
"knowing" I'm right, and then finding I'd overlooked something really 
obvious :(

-- 
Simon Hobson

Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.

_______________________________________________
rrd-users mailing list
rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]