[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: rrd-users
Subject: [rrd-users] Re: Strange rrdtool behaviour (IMHO)
From: serge.maandag () staff ! zeelandnet ! nl (Serge Maandag)
Date: 2005-01-09 16:47:51
Message-ID: 91FC132ACA694F45A6E42CE8E593838C01CCFABE () zmx ! staff ! zeelandnet ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]
> both cases only a fraction more than half the actual loss. If
> this is indeed the case it should be mostly remedied by
> making the script run a minute later, or is there a better
> way to accomplish this?
In perl I'd do something like:
$timestamp = $step * int($timestamp/$size)
You are using a shell script, so you'll have to call some
external program like bc, dc or awk.
> Hmmm, This is logical for the graph itsself, but IMHO
> shouldn't be for raw MAX and MIN calculations as in GPRINT's.
> A Maximum is a maximum and by definition shouldn't be
> averaged if it doesn't have to be for viewing purposes.
But a GPRINT is for viewing purposes. Afaik, a GPRINT is not raw,
but just as averaged as your graph is.
> BTW, am I correct in assuming that the only reason to add
> more RRA's with a bigger step are to minimise CPU-time at
> graph generation time, or am I missing something obvious here?
Almost, it also saves disk space.
Serge.
-------------
Op de inhoud van dit e-mailbericht en de daaraan gehechte bijlagen is de inhoud van \
de volgende disclaimer van toepassing: http://www.zeelandnet.nl/disclaimer.php
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic