[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       rrd-users
Subject:    [rrd-users] Re: how to get a step of 60
From:       alex () ergens ! op ! het ! net (Alex van den Bogaerdt)
Date:       2004-08-19 9:56:59
Message-ID: 20040819115659.A23406 () slot ! hollandcasino ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:11:26AM +0200, Cristian Ghezzi wrote:

> Finally, Alex is not mad at you for your legitimate question, he is just 
> still upset with me for my recent messages about the "unexpected" 
> behaviour of the "GAUGE + MAX" option, which is a matter still 
> unresolved. So, don't let him scare you and keep asking questions. :-)

Bullshit.  Your matter is resolved from response number one.  You just
won't believe the answer you got, for whatever reason.  I don't care.

More bullshit:

quote: "I found the behaviour of rrdtool when using the MAX CF to be
misleading to say the least."

This is not a question.  This is a statement and it is based on wrong
assumptions.

"peaks are filtered" is just as wrong.

You didn't get it, you don't get it and because you still do not
believe me you will not get it in the future.

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]